Okay, let's talk about
biblical interpretation. As many of
y'all know, I am adamantly against private interpretation, though this does not
mean that you can’t have a bible verse mean something to you a certain
way.
I was reading the Bible
this morning, (Douay-Rheims version), and was reading the Gospel of Mark. I came across a verse that was familiar, but
out of place. Not because of what it
said, but because I usually read the Revised Standard Version Catholic edition
of the Bible (Though, not solely so). It
says (in Mark 8:39 in the DR, I’m not sure other versions of the Bible have it)
“Amen I say to you, that there are some here, who shall not taste death, till
they see the power of God coming in”.
Now, this could be
chopped up to a marginal gloss, and it parallels Matthew 16:28 and Luke
9:27. Now, the thing is, that pretty much
all Bibles have Mt 16:28 and Lk 9:27, so we can infer that Jesus did say
something to this effect. Now, did Jesus
incorrectly predict the end of the world?
Nope. Let’s talk about this. In Lk 9:27, in the RSVCE, the word used is “power”
(just as in Mark 8:39 DR), The word used in Mt 16:28 in the RSVCE says “there
are some here who will not taste death before the see the Son of man coming
into his kingdom”. (DR says something
similar).
Now, what are we to make
of this? Did Jesus think the end was
near? In a way, yes. But, not in the way modern film would
think. Jesus was predicting the coming
of the glory of the Kingdom of God with the establishment of the Church age and
the power of God with the destruction of the temple in 70 ad. Thus, contrary to what some skeptical
biblical scholars believe, Jesus did not fail his own prediction. Jesus’s earthly ministry was about three
years, so it’s very reasonable that some of the younger people he was
addressing would have lived to see that.
Jesus
told people the truth (for he is the truth, John 14:6), and, just as today,
people misunderstood him. In Jesus’s
time, the Pharisees would often twist scripture (especially the Books of
Moses), to support their claims. When a
skeptic argues that Jesus’s prediction failed, they’re doing one of two things:
Dismissing all evidence to the contrary, or nihilistically denying the evidence
existed to begin with. I don’t expect
everyone to accept the gospel as truth (although it is true), but I at least
expect people to be honest, and when skeptical scholars act like spoiled brats,
they do no one favours.
No comments:
Post a Comment